Comments

  1. Okay , Cunt November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    wtf is wrong with his left thumb finger??

  2. American GI 1967 November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    I still think 2 tin cans and a string are a better way of communicating.

  3. Fieras Alzuood November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    يد

  4. Han Zhang November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    this is fuxking bullshit, for older laptop without hardware decoding has a massive hit on battery.

  5. Sawanyo November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    x = ?

  6. Sun Kim November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    Why is the "best" video option for YouTube a MP4 and not WebM VP9?

  7. K-FAKE Channel November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    pirated movie now use HEVC,, so does Nvidia. and even Intel Skylake.

  8. PROHDGaming November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    is it possible to produce VP9 videos right out of Video editing software? what would be best way to covert Mp4 to Vp9?

  9. Emre Can November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    When this is gonna be default ?

  10. Юра из общаги November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    when no H.264 on Youtube ? only vp9

  11. whytewulf2015 November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    So, VP9 was apparently released over a year ago yet it's still not available to upload to youtube in VP9 codec nor being processed in VP9 which makes it worthless at the moment…. and the new 60fps youtube was rolled out and will be available "In the coming months"… 3 Months later…. Why are you so slow? and why aren't you ever giving us a solid release date so we don't have to check back every few months to know you didn't change anything yet?

  12. jawad saleemi November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    How can I force the VP encoder to encode the video at the target bit rate instead of this parameter being used as the maximum bitrate? I am using VP8 encoder for real time streaming and I would like to configure the encoder to strictly follow target bit rate as the current bit rate. 

  13. Andrey Morozov November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    I'm encoding video(Full HD) from x264 to vp9 using ffmpeg 2.2.3 and it's so very very slow, about 0.01fps. It's mean that my video(1min) will be done in 50 hours and it's only first pass. WTF???

  14. Maxime Lebled November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    Really excited and happy about those improvements, especially the psychovisual optimizations! That's something the encoder desperately needed. Awesome!

  15. Jennifer Liou November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    Super helpful and informative.

  16. Rupesh Kumar Vuppu November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

     I have been a huge fan of Ogg Vorbis a decade ago..Never imagined it could lead to such enhancements in video and audio compression……This video is simply amazing

  17. Shawn Drape November 13, 2017 at 7:58 am

    How does this compare to H.265 though? Isn't that what VP9 is traditionally contrasted with?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Name *
Email *
Website